SFS 2 / SF 3

Back to SFS 2

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Was documented evidence of data integrity checks for critical service backups maintained throughout the review period to confirm restorability?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: Verified records showing periodic integrity validation of backup copies against source data

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: The organization. Scope: Critical services identified in the disaster recovery plan requiring data integrity validation. Evidence period: The full review period specified in the assessment scope. Required evidence: Backup integrity validation logs; Data checksum verification reports; Restorability test documentation confirming data consistency. Negative criterion: Absence of integrity verification documentation despite backup implementation. Missing evidence: Evidence pending when backup systems exist but integrity validation records are unavailable

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.