SFS 9 / SF 4

Back to SFS 9

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Has documented evidence confirmed that the scope boundaries for security audits of in-scope applications explicitly defined the system components, data flows, and trust boundaries under review throughout the evidence period?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: Documented scope boundary definitions exist specifying components, data flows, and trust boundaries

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: Organization conducting security audits. Scope: In-scope applications undergoing security auditing. Evidence period: Review period. Required evidence: Audit planning documents showing explicit system boundaries; Diagrams or textual descriptions of data flows and trust boundaries. Negative criterion: No evidence of defined scope boundaries for the audit. Missing evidence: Pending verification of documented boundary definitions

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.