SFS 9 / SF 6

Back to SFS 9

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Has documented evidence confirmed that security auditors for in-scope applications maintained independence from development and operational teams throughout the review period?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: documented evidence verifies auditor independence from development/operations teams

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: security auditors. Scope: in-scope applications undergoing security auditing. Evidence period: the full review period. Required evidence: audit engagement terms specifying independence requirements; organizational charts demonstrating separation of duties. Negative criterion: evidence shows auditors participated in development or operational management. Missing evidence: pending assessment awaiting auditor independence documentation

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.