SFS E / SF F

Back to SFS E

Status: Pending question: unreviewed placeholder. Do not use it in an assessment.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

[Placeholder] Has the condition for SF F in "AI-Oriented Ethics (Training and Implementation)" been satisfied?

Plain-language explanation

This is an unreviewed placeholder for SF F in SFS E: AI-Oriented Ethics (Training and Implementation). Replace it with one specific condition before using it in an assessment.

Assessment criterion and evidence

The assessment criterion, system boundary, evidence period, required evidence, and acceptable alternatives have not been defined.

Pending review

catalog 00EF exhausted review attempts: Review rejected or left unresolved findings: {"decision": "rejected", "unresolved": ["Timeframe conflict between pre-deployment requirement and continuous evidence period", "Duplication of stakeholder awareness criterion from position 00EE"], "failedChecks": [{"ruleId": "no-false-source-verification", "rationale": "RAG_MODE=disabled requires empty sourceRefs, but candidate falsely implies verifiable source support through contract wording and changeReason referencing 'pinned topic boundaries' as authoritative evidence. 'Pinned topic boundaries' are template constraints, not verified legal/technical sources.", "sourceRefs": []}, {"ruleId": "single-condition", "rationale": "Question combines multiple independently assessable conditions: (1) existence of documented ethical limitations, (2) documentation of potential discriminatory risks, and (3) accessibility to stakeholders. Each should be a separate question per concern-coverage rules.", "sourceRefs": []}, {"ruleId": "scope-and-evidence", "rationale": "Evidence period 'throughout the review period' conflicts with 'prior to deployment' requirement. Documentation must exist before deployment (static condition), not maintained continuously during operations (dynamic condition). Mixing timeframes creates untestable criterion.", "sourceRefs": []}, {"ruleId": "concern-coverage", "rationale": "Question duplicates scope of existing position 00EE ('Did the organization maintain documented evidence confirming stakeholders were informed of known ethical limitations and potential discriminatory risks prior to deployment'). Both address stakeholder awareness of ethical limitations, violating independent concern coverage rule.", "sourceRefs": []}, {"ruleId": "criterion-change-provenance", "rationale": "With no prior accepted question (parentQuestionDigest: null), changeReason must not reference 'authoritative evidence'. The phrase 'pinned topic boundaries requiring distinguishable ethical documentation' invents false provenance as the boundaries are methodological constraints, not evidence.", "sourceRefs": []}]}

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.