SFS 2 / SF F

Back to SFS 2

Status: Pending question: unreviewed placeholder. Do not use it in an assessment.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

[Placeholder] Has the condition for SF F in "Backup and Disaster Recovery Plan" been satisfied?

Plain-language explanation

This is an unreviewed placeholder for SF F in SFS 2: Backup and Disaster Recovery Plan. Replace it with one specific condition before using it in an assessment.

Assessment criterion and evidence

The assessment criterion, system boundary, evidence period, required evidence, and acceptable alternatives have not been defined.

Pending review

catalog 002F exhausted review attempts: Review rejected or left unresolved findings: {"decision": "rejected", "unresolved": ["Question scope misalignment with SFS 2 topic boundaries", "Fixture scenarios conflating storage management (SFS 4) with disaster recovery planning (SFS 2)"], "failedChecks": [{"ruleId": "scope-and-evidence", "rationale": "Violates pinned area boundaries: question focuses on routine storage security controls (documented access controls, storage configuration) which belong to SFS 4 per concern description: 'Routine storage management and retention belong to SFS 4'. SFS 2 should assess backup configuration for recovery capability, not ongoing storage protection mechanisms", "sourceRefs": []}, {"ruleId": "concern-coverage", "rationale": "Mismatches concern inventory basis: while using correct concern ID '2-concern-topic-boundaries', the question addresses storage security specifications rather than the SFS 2 concern's defined scope of 'backup configuration... distinguishing from restoration success'. Evidence requested (access controls) aligns with SFS 4 topic", "sourceRefs": []}, {"ruleId": "fixture-decisions", "rationale": "Fixture scenarios incorrectly focus on storage management: 'backup configuration allowing administrative deletion' and 'storage security controls' reference routine storage operations (SFS 4 domain), not SFS 2's disaster recovery planning context. Satisfied case describes system logs for modification prevention (storage management), not recovery test evidence", "sourceRefs": []}, {"ruleId": "criterion-change-provenance", "rationale": "Invalid changeReason for initial submission: claims 'revised to remove' terminology but has no prior accepted parent (parentQuestionDigest=null). With no accepted parent, must describe as initial derivation from area boundaries without referencing prior revisions", "sourceRefs": []}]}

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.