SFS 9 / SF 3

Back to SFS 9

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Has documented evidence confirmed that security audits for in-scope applications covered the entire review period without significant gaps?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: audit reports demonstrate continuous coverage of the full review period

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: organization. Scope: in-scope applications. Evidence period: review period. Required evidence: dated security audit reports showing scope and coverage period. Negative criterion: audit reports show missing periods or insufficient coverage duration. Missing evidence: pending verification

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.