SFS 5 / SF 6

Back to SFS 5

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Has the organization verified through documented evidence that network routing configurations enforce required segmentation and prevent unauthorized traffic paths during the review period?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: Documented verification demonstrates routing controls enforce segmentation boundaries and block unauthorized traffic paths between isolated network segments

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: the organization. Scope: network routing configurations. Evidence period: during the review period. Required evidence: Reviewed network routing tables and path analysis; Evidence of segmentation enforcement in routing configurations. Negative criterion: Documented verification shows misconfigurations allowing unauthorized traffic paths between network segments. Missing evidence: Pending until documented verification of routing configuration controls exists

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.