SFS E / SF 3

Back to SFS E

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Has documented evidence been maintained throughout the review period confirming that privacy impact assessments were conducted for all AI systems processing sensitive personal information to protect data subjects' rights and prevent discriminatory outcomes?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: Documented privacy impact assessments demonstrating consideration of data minimization, purpose limitation, and mitigation of discriminatory risks

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: Organization developing or deploying AI systems. Scope: All AI systems processing sensitive personal information (e.g., health, biometric, or behavioral data). Evidence period: Entire review period. Required evidence: Timestamped privacy impact assessment reports. Negative criterion: No evidence of privacy impact assessments conducted or documented for AI systems processing sensitive personal information. Missing evidence: Pending completion of privacy impact assessment documentation

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.