SFS E / SF C

Back to SFS E

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Did the organization maintain documented evidence confirming that formal ethical acceptance criteria specific to each AI system's intended use case were established and justified prior to deployment throughout the review period?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: Documented justification exists for ethical acceptance criteria aligned with specific use cases and intended populations

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: organization. Scope: AI systems under development and deployment. Evidence period: throughout the review period. Required evidence: Documented ethical acceptance criteria for each AI system; Justification linking criteria to intended use case and populations. Negative criterion: No evidence of use-case-specific ethical criteria or justification. Missing evidence: pending evidence review

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.