SFS 6 / SF A

Back to SFS 6

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Has documented verification confirmed that security event logs in the central repository contain sufficient detail (including user identifiers, timestamps, and event specifics) to support incident investigation throughout the review period?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: Logs contain required user identifiers, timestamps, and event-specific details enabling investigation

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: The organization. Scope: Central security log repository for all critical systems within declared scope. Evidence period: The review period. Required evidence: Documented verification showing sample logs with required detail elements. Negative criterion: Logs lack essential details preventing effective incident analysis. Missing evidence: No documented verification available despite operational logging claims

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.