SFS E / SF 6

Back to SFS E

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Was formal documentation maintained throughout the review period confirming that ethical considerations were explicitly addressed in the selection and configuration of each AI system's model architecture?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: Documented evidence confirms ethical considerations were addressed in model selection and configuration

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: the organization. Scope: all deployed AI systems. Evidence period: the review period. Required evidence: Formal records of ethical considerations in model architecture decisions. Negative criterion: No documentation confirming ethical considerations in model architecture decisions. Missing evidence: Pending verification of documentation

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.