SFS E / SF 7

Back to SFS E

Status: Question model review passed; solution and completed SF authoring pending.

This is a generated authoring draft. Human approval and operational assessment results have not been supplied.

Question

Was documented evidence maintained throughout the review period confirming that consultations with representatives from affected populations were conducted to identify potential ethical risks prior to AI system deployment?

Plain-language explanation

Model-reviewed question draft. Completed explanations and a canonical solution are pending. The proposed positive criterion is: Consultations conducted with documented evidence of participant representation, discussion topics, and identified ethical risks

Assessment criterion and evidence

Actor: Organization deploying AI systems. Scope: All AI systems where ethical risks could significantly impact individuals or groups. Evidence period: The review period. Required evidence: Meeting records showing participation of representative groups from affected populations; Documented ethical risks identified during consultation sessions; Evidence linking consultation outcomes to system design or deployment decisions. Negative criterion: No documented evidence of required consultations with affected population representatives. Missing evidence: Pending assessment when evidence is absent or insufficient

View the JSON record (opens in a new tab).

Assessment result: unset.